On September 1, 2003 04:40 am, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
I already cut down stuff from the regular distribution. (Would you also like to get rid of the man page and html for instance? Just tell me.)
Yes, just get rid of everything but the xd.c file, and place that one in the same dir with the other stuff, no need for a subdir.
-- I'd rather have an explicit list of tests to include, rather than a dynamic find.
Ok. How? Send a patch or an example.
In the Makefile, have a variable with all the tests, like so:
TESTS = \ dlls/advapi32/tests/advapi32 \ dlls/comctl32/tests/comctl32 \ dlls/dsound/tests/dsound \ ...
Just include the base name in list, you can construct the actual .exe name from here:
CROSSTESTS = $(TESTS:%=%_crosstest.exe) WINETESTS = $(TESTS:%=%_test.exe.so)
BTW, we should do things in a portable manner, so that winetests builds and runs under Linux as well. That is to say, we should be able to build winetests under linux, in which case it should just package WINETESTS. The above will move us in the right direction.
-- We need to integrate it into our build system.
Yes, I was thinking about that. How about waiting a little until the development has stabilized and everybody had their say?
Sure, but the faster we get it into the tree, the better. Witness winecfg for why this is the case :)