On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 November 2016 at 14:09, Grazvydas Ignotas notasas@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 November 2016 at 23:10, Grazvydas Ignotas notasas@gmail.com wrote:
- {HW_VENDOR_AMD, CARD_AMD_RADEON_R9, "AMD Radeon R9 290", DRIVER_AMD_R600, 4096},
- {HW_VENDOR_AMD, CARD_AMD_RADEON_R9, "AMD Radeon R9 290", DRIVER_AMD_RX, 4096},
Is that change intentional?
Yes, from looking at dxdiag output posted by various people on the net, R9 290 is also using aticfx32.dll . I haven't checked the other older cards, so left them alone.
Ok. For future reference, it would probably be better to make that kind of change in a separate patch. If you (or anyone else) could check some of the older cards as well, that would be helpful. The different driver name may have more to do with the driver version than with the hardware.
Probably, I guess it's best to report the latest one?
Also, is the driver name the same for 32-bit and 64-bits processes?
No, but the same is true for Intel driver names and wine currently only has the 32bit ones.