Re: ntdll: CreateRemoteThread and RtlCreateUserThread for remote processes, take 2

[Mike Hearn]

On 8/3/06, Dan Kegel  wrote:
> The goal is to get rid of the service thread; the service thread was
> just there as a placeholder.  Once it's gone, signals are appropriate.
> The realtime signal is just there as a placeholder until we figure out
> how to squeze this down into SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2.

Hm so you'll have to co-ordinate switching the signal mask between
threads as they start up and shut down? I'm not sure that can be done
atomically.

thanks -mike