Re: msvcp60: Remove superfluous semicolons

[Andrew Talbot]

Jacek Caban wrote:
> It's probably better to change the macro to require the semicolon.
>
> Jacek

The reason I did it that way was because there are two variants of the
DEFINE_CXX_DATA macro, surrounded by an #ifndef construct: one comprising
three struct declarations, all ending in semicolons, the other comprised
three struct declarations (ending in semicolons) and one function definition
(ending in a curly brace). I suppose I could move the function above the
structs, but that would require forward declarations.