On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:22:09PM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 17:34 +0530 schrieb Vijay Kiran Kamuju:
Add InitializeSecurityContext for schannel in secur32.dll
+static SECURITY_STATUS SEC_ENTRY schan_InitializeSecurityContextW(
- PCredHandle phCredential, PCtxtHandle phContext, SEC_WCHAR
*pszTargetName,
- ULONG fContextReq, ULONG Reserved1, ULONG TargetDataRep,
- PSecBufferDesc pInput,ULONG Reserved2, PCtxtHandle phNewContext,
- PSecBufferDesc pOutput, ULONG *pfContextAttr, PTimeStamp ptsExpiry)
+{
I Remembered a statement from fefe (diet-libc => www.fefe.de) about "Writing Small and Fast Software":
It is still clear, what each Argument does, when you remove the Variable-Names from the Declaration?
- Yes: Efficient Design.
- No: Your Interface is to generic == bloated
static SECURITY_STATUS SEC_ENTRY schan_InitializeSecurityContextW( PCredHandle, PCtxtHandle, SEC_WCHAR *, ULONG, ULONG, ULONG, PSecBufferDesc, ULONG, PCtxtHandle, PSecBufferDesc, ULONG, PTimeStamp) {
We all should thank the People who did such a Design :-)
However, this only works in newer C compilers as far as I know... ;)
Ciao, Marcus