On Monday 17 January 2005 11:30, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson jakov@vmlinux.org writes:
I would prefer to have all failed tests at the top, so one could see easily which ones need to be fixed.
Not being an addition but a change, I'd like to hear others' opinion on this matter. My personal feeling is that losing alphabetical ordering on test names isn't worth it, as color monitors are fairly common nowadays. So vote for the change!
I'd vote for tests staying in the same relative position from run to run (be that alphabetical or whatever).
It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email whenever a test failed.
Finding out the author of a test isn't easy, it requires some digging into CVS. On the other hand, I'd choose an opt-in method instead. But it's a separate project anyway, the present machinery has pretty much nothing to facilitate this. The summary.txt files are easy to parse and available by HTTP, so one could use them to get the figures.
One possibility is to send an email to the wine-devel list when something breaks (but only the one!).
There were mixed reactions to this, for WRT, so I filtered all the emails and double-checked before forwarding them.
Paul.