Paul Vriens schrieb:
On 01/10/2010 05:44 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c index 1bab21d..e351813 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c @@ -677,7 +677,8 @@ static void test_query_object(void) ok( status == STATUS_SUCCESS, "NtQueryObject failed %x\n", status ); ok( len> sizeof(UNICODE_STRING), "unexpected len %u\n", len ); str = (UNICODE_STRING *)buffer;
- ok( sizeof(UNICODE_STRING) + str->Length + sizeof(WCHAR) == len,
"unexpected len %u\n", len );
- ok( sizeof(UNICODE_STRING) + str->Length == len /* WinNT */ ||
sizeof(UNICODE_STRING) + str->Length + sizeof(WCHAR) == len,"unexpected len %u\n", len ); trace( "got %s len %u\n", wine_dbgstr_w(str->Buffer), len ); pNtClose( handle ); }
Looks a bit like:
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/57319
Except that I used broken() for NT4 which IMHO makes more sense as this is the only platform with this issue.
Hi Paul, sorry didnt see your patch, it was not my purpose to compete for that. I also had broken() in mind, but using http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069721.html i am not sure.