On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Paul Millar wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch changes the way the regression testing works slightly. The default behaviour should be the same, but there's some optional "enhancements":
o If you set WINETEST_REPORT_SUCCESS environment variable to 1, successful tests are reported as well as unsuccessful ones.
I don't know if this is really useful but why not.
o If you set WINETEST_CONTINUE_ON_FAIL environment variable to 1, "make test" will run all tests from all modules, rather than failing on the first failing module.
This looks like it is equivalent to make -k.
o The commands "named_ok", "set_name" and "unset_name" now exist (in C and Perl). You can use these to specify a name for tests either individually (via named_ok) or for a region (via set_name and unset_name)
I'm not too sure about these:
-ok( ($atom >= 0xc000) && ($atom <= 0xffff) && !defined($wine::err) ); +named_ok( "Adding atom "$name" via GlobalAddAtomA()", ($atom >= 0xc000) && ($atom <= 0xffff) && !defined($wine::err) );
Did you know that you can also do:
ok( ($atom >= 0xc000) && ($atom <= 0xffff) && !defined($wine::err), "could not find atom $name, atom=$atom, err=$wine::err" );
This seems pretty similar and works in perl and C. Also about the following:
+set_name( "Checking GlobalAddAtom[AW](i) i < 0xbffff"); for ($i = 0x0001; ($i <= 0xbfff); $i += 27) { ok( GlobalAddAtomA($i) && !defined($wine::err) ); ok( GlobalAddAtomW($i) && !defined($wine::err) ); } +unset_name();
would be better as:
named_tests( "Checking GlobalAddAtom[AW](i) i < 0xbffff") { for ($i = 0x0001; ($i <= 0xbfff); $i += 27) { ok( GlobalAddAtomA($i) && !defined($wine::err) ); ok( GlobalAddAtomW($i) && !defined($wine::err) ); } }
This way one would not accidentally forget to unset the name. But I am not sure it adds that much to:
trace( "Checking GlobalAddAtom[AW](i) i < 0xbffff"); for ($i = 0x0001; ($i <= 0xbfff); $i += 27) { ok( GlobalAddAtomA($i) && !defined($wine::err) ); ok( GlobalAddAtomW($i) && !defined($wine::err) ); }
Traces are not printed by default but will be if you run the test as: runtest -v ... instead of runtest -q ...
-- Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ It really galls me that most of the computer power in the world is wasted on screen savers. Chris Caldwell from the GIMPS project http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm