Re: Towards pure wine: a step by step approach

[Dan Kegel]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Scott Ritchie  wrote:
> > Such an attempt should probably
> > start at the bottom, cleaning up modules in the order
> >   wineserver, ntdll, kernel32, gdi32, user32, ...
>
> Is this also the order of the most mature modules?  It seems to make
>  sense doing this kind of cleanup on the more stable parts first, since
>  the fixes are more likely to be permanent.

Yes, I think so (though user32 can't quite be called fully stable).

Doing it bottom-up is also natural because otherwise
we'd see lots of lower-level module errors while valgrinding
or running conformance tests on upper-level modules.