On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:37 AM, James Mckenzie jjmckenzie51@earthlink.net wrote:
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com wrote:
Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM To: Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org" wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
Can we add in a line at the top saying "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed just like any other Linux application using your package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove, select Wine, and click Apply Changes).
Nitpick, but instead of 'Linux', use 'native'. FreeBSD's ports contains wine, as well as NetBSD's.
Please exclude MacOSX which does not include Wine and I doubt it ever will.
MacOSX doesn't have a native/builtin package manager that is used to download and install applications. Fink/etc. come close, but A) they aren't there by default and B) that's why the qualifier 'usually' is there.