Re: TaxCut and C++ exception handling

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Dimitrie O. Paun"  wrote:
> > IMHO Crossover Office has a better patch
> > which adds printing of the message "fixme:DLLNAME:APINAME: .spec empty
> > stub!"
>
> Doesn't this violate the general format we use for debug messages:
>   <class>:<channel>:<message>

IMHO it doesn't. DLLNAME plays the role of the channel there.
> Maybe something like this fits a bit better:
>   "fixme:stub:DLLNAME:APINAME: .spec empty stub!"

It should be understandable without mentioning the word "stub" two times
what the message is about.
> But if we have a channel for each DLL, which is actually not a bad idea,
> maybe it's not that bad afterall... :)

Well, that's actually not a debug channel of course, but a good approximation
(read: fake) of it.