Re: LoadString problems

[James Hawkins]

On 7/31/05, Felix Nawothnig  wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > > > Maybe that only returns the
> > > > hinstance of the process calling the module, and not the hinstance of
> > > > the module itself.
> > >
> > > Ofcourse it doesn't do that, how should it know from what module the
> > > call came from?
> >
> > I didn't think so, so shouldn't GetModuleHandle(NULL) work?  It leads
> > me to believe there's a bug in our GetModuleHandle.
>
> Eh? Ofcourse GetModuleHandle(NULL) works - it retrieves a handle to the
> calling process.

Ah I misunderstood which case you said was correct before.