Geoffrey Hausheer wrote:
On Sunday 07 April 2002 20:29, you wrote:
"Geoffrey Hausheer" i8e7fkwmsl1@phracturedblue.com wrote:
So is there a better solution than the three I've listed? And why won't wine let me include 'windows.h', but under windows it is required?
Probably it would be better to use Wine headers to compile Wine tests.
I disagree that this is a good idea. The idea is to test that wine behaves in the same manner as Windows does.
While I agree with that sentiment, I would like to point out that it may be that WINE has an incorrect function definition that is backed up by an incorrect declaration in the .h file. Such a situation may result in compiling for wine with the wine headers working, as well as compiling for Windows with the windows headers, but missing the binary compatibility support goal.