--- Saulius Krasuckas saulius2@ar.fi.lt wrote:
- On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
- Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:54:56 PM, Ivan Leo
Puoti wrote:
Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the
safedisc status is.
Currently it works fine, and I believe what we
have is more or less
ready for CVS. However Vitaly told me Alexandre
didn't like the object
manager Vitaly wrote, mostly he didn't like
permanent objects, that
drivers depend on.
Following Alexandre's suggestions I've managed to
get OM working without
support for permanent objects. There will be some
modification required
for ntoskrnl for that to work. I'm just about
finished integrating new
OM into ntoskrnl tree and almost ready to give it
a try.
As far as OM goes it's mostly finished and passes
all but two of om
tests. Also it don't see any side-affects from it
either. All the
programs I've tested work in the same way as they
were before. All named
object moved to directories and using
RootDirectory part of
OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES for create/open.
Attached is the final revision of the directory
object implementation.
If it looks ok I'm ready to send some patches <g>
Any updates on this? What lefts to be done for ntoskrnl to enter the tree? :)
I've waited so long for this mythical ntoskrnl.exe that "doesn't change NtDeviceIoControl()" and "uses IPCs" to finally enter CVS. Can you please mail around a sample of the code so we have some idea of how on earth it works, I'm dying to know...
Thank you Damjan
__________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com