Re: Scrollkeeper, the documentation, XML, and the way forward

[Alexandre Julliard]

Scott Ritchie  writes:
> Well, let's discuss it here then.  What's so great about SGML, when
> scrollkeeper doesn't like it and we can convert it to html/txt with
> similar tools to the ones we use now?

There's nothing great about SGML, no argument here; but as far as I
can tell XML is the same mess except a bit worse. And I can't say I'm
particularly thrilled to have to change all the documentation every
couple of years just to follow the so-called standard of the day.