On 10/31/21 7:14 PM, David Kahurani wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:11 PM Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com mailto:nsivov@codeweavers.com> wrote:
On 10/31/21 6:34 PM, David Kahurani wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@gmail.com <mailto:k.kahurani@gmail.com>> > --- > include/commctrl.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/commctrl.h b/include/commctrl.h > index 41abceb..d67f5f7 100644 > --- a/include/commctrl.h > +++ b/include/commctrl.h > @@ -3939,8 +3939,8 @@ typedef struct tagLVITEMINDEX > (INT)SNDMSGW((hwnd),LVM_SETITEMW,0,(LPARAM)(const LVITEMW *)(pitem)) > #define ListView_SetItem WINELIB_NAME_AW(ListView_SetItem) > #define ListView_SetItemState(hwnd,i,data,dataMask) \ > -{ LVITEM _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\ > - SNDMSG(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM) (LPLVITEM)&_LVi);} > +{ LVITEMW _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\ > + SNDMSGW(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM) (LPLVITEMW)&_LVi);} > #define ListView_GetItemState(hwnd,i,mask) \ > (UINT)SNDMSG((hwnd),LVM_GETITEMSTATE,(WPARAM)(UINT)(i),(LPARAM)(UINT)(mask)) > #define ListView_SetCheckState(hwndLV, i, bCheck) \ This doesn't match what SDK does.
Are you saying there is some other magic beyond what is already in this macro or a difference in width(s) used?
SNDMSG resolves to either SendMessageA or SendMessageW, I don't see anything special for _SetItemState() in SDK.
It's not clear what motivated this change, could you clarify?