Re: (Resend) [PATCH] Fix handling of zero_bits argument in NtAllocateVirtualMemory

[Alexandre Julliard]

[e-mail] writes:
> A lot of internal Wine functionality unfortunately depends on the old
> Wine behavior, but thankfully, all of the uses seem to be redundant,
> as no function requested an alignment higher than the minimum!
> It may however be that I have not fully understood the code,
> as it is not always clear what alignment is requested.

At least the signal stack one could potentially need a larger
alignment. Also I think it would be nice to preserve the functionality
in an internal function to avoid wasting address space where possible.