On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr writes:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
No, CHAR is really supposed to be the same thing as char, since it's used for strings. Otherwise you'll need casts all over the place.
Ideally we'd check whether 'char' was signed or unsigned in Visual C++ for PowerPC (there was a Windows NT 3.51 for PowerPC). I doubt that Microsoft would have made it unsigned and then we'd need to do the same to really be source compatibile.
Sure, but we would do that by adding -fsigned-char in winegcc, not by making CHAR and char two different types.
Oh. Good point. I forgot about that one. I guess that's a hint for Austin <g>...