Re: winetest: add support for revision info

[Alexandre Julliard]

Ferenc Wagner  writes:
> I think I also sent it wine-patches.  The first post really
> was a mistake, sorry for raising confusion.

If you did then it got lost somewhere, please resumit.
> Yes, functionally it's the same, but reading CVS/Entries is
> much faster (Dimi's reason for making it conditional was the
> enormous amount of time it required), and if those files are
> not present an empty file it will be created silently, which
> is the expected behaviour.

OK, as long as it fails gracefully that's fine.