On October 29, 2002 10:15 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
However in this case there are some logical relation between the patches.
Can't argue, hand hurts. But histroy shows that you like to argue for no good reason :). Case in point:
[snip expication why you had to do it this way]
OK, this time they might be not so useful to read both since they are almost 100% percent independant
:)))
But, IT DOES NOT MATTER if they are dependant. My patches are 99% of the time dependant, and I still send them as separate emails. Do you want me do send an email with 15 patches in them???
If they are depemdant (and that's not obvious), just add a small blurb in the comment section (the one before the ChangeLog). It's that simple.
Why not, instead of complaining to people who doesn't (or only partly) listens, write some sort of mail "filter" the reformats the mail to one or more mail of a more appropriate format. Inline attachments and that sort of things...
Oh, come on man, this _is_ silly. You are the only one sending multiple patches per email, for crying out loud! :)