Re: [PATCH 00/27] Fix test message sequences to support WinEvents.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Connor McAdams  writes:
> This patch series adds missing WinEvents to the message sequences used
> in tests, as well as marking all WinEvents as optional until they've
> been implemented. I'm not sure if this is the correct way to do it, it
> may make more sense to add a new message flag to indicate that a
> particular WinEvent hasn't been implemented.

'optional' is for messages that are sometimes not present on Windows, it
shouldn't be used to skip tests just because the events are not
implemented in Wine.