Re: Dr. Seuss, licensing, and WINE

[Brett Glass]

At 10:22 AM 2/8/2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > This is not what Richard Stallman and Bradley Kuhn of the FSF say. They
> > say, most emphatically, that it is NOT Open Source.
>
> This is BS. Go read http://www.opensource.org/, in particular:
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html

The fact that a few members of the Board of the Open Source Initiative
have, for purely political and economic reasons, tried to ignore the plain 
language of their own definition does not change that definition.

--Brett Glass