Re: Time to commit remote ops for VirtualAllocEx, CreateRemoteThread

[James Hawkins]

On 8/5/06, Dan Kegel  wrote:
> On 8/5/06, Eric Pouech  wrote:
> > > > Still, doing that stuff in APCs is a step in the right direction, you
> > > > just need to make sure you can safely run these APCs from the SIGUSR1
> > > > handler.
> > >
> > > Do we have to verify that now, or can that wait until we want
> > > to add support for debuggers?
> >
> > Most of the *serious* debuggers I know of make use of remote virtual
> > functions. This includes WineDbg, WinDbg (the MS one)...
> > - WinDbg (the MS debugger)
>
> Installer doesn't work:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
> (not a showstopper, but does make it harder to test with)

This is fixed by "msi: Fix the compressed files logic"

http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-August/029358.html

but it hasn't been committed yet.