Nathaniel Gray wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roderick Colenbrander thunderbird2k@gmx.net wrote:
Say, http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/ seems to be a popular source of nearly up to date wine builds for the mac. How about we link to it from http://winehq.org/download/ ?
Furthermore, are his packages good enough to support? If so, how 'bout we ask him to add links to bugzilla and the appdb from his page?
Most importantly we need to get rid of the Darwine name. It causes a lot of unneeded confusion.
Yes, I would like to keep Darwine as the name of the old powerpc project that combined an x86 emulator and wine.
Can we convince Mike and Zach to switch names to just plain Wine?
As one who just spent several days trying to figure this stuff out and still isn't quite sure he got it right, I'd like to add "pretty please?"
I would like to see something like the following (and it follows the OpenOffice.org strategy for releases):
Wine-<version>-<platform>-<CPU>-<installer>.<compression-type>
So Wine for the Mac Intel would appear like this:
Wine-1.1.9-MacOSX-Intel-DragnDrop.dmg
Where Wine for a X86 for Ubuntu 8.1 would appear like this for an x86:
Wine-1.1.9-Ubuntu8.10-x86-apt.tar.gz (assuming that the release was in tar.gz.)
What do the rest of you think?
James McKenzie