Re: Valgrind results for Nov 12 & 13

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dan Kegel"  writes:
> Oh, he'd undoubtedly prefer ignoring to memsetting.
> But he would like it even better if we can
> avoid sending unneeded bytes.  Are the extra
> bytes at the end (they ought to be)?  If so,
> whatever decides how many bytes to send could
> be just a bit smarter.

Actually memset is OK for server requests, not because of Valgrind but
because of backwards compatibility concerns. It makes it possible to
extend a request knowing that old clients will send 0 for the new
fields.