Re: [PATCH 1/8] wsdapi: Use slim reader/writer lock instead of critical section.

[Zebediah Figura]

On 13/09/18 03:44, Owen Rudge wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Owen Rudge
>
> dlls/wsdapi/discovery.c       | 13 ++++++-------
>  dlls/wsdapi/network.c         |  4 ++--
>  dlls/wsdapi/wsdapi_internal.h |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

I haven't looked at the rest of the series, but is this functionally
necessary? Given that SRW locks will provide worse performance on Wine
than critical sections. Although I think SRW locks can be made to use
futexes internally too...