On 17 June 2015 at 11:52, Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com wrote:
BTW, while investigating it, I found that we will have more compatibility issues in the future. It seems that gnutls doesn't consider backward compatibility seriously [2].
Cheers, Jacek
[1] http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/112128 [2] https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/commit/b604a9093bccf933baba125634034a6d4ce9...
I don't know how much GnuTLS does or doesn't care about backwards compatibility, but note that the commit you're referring to comes right after one bumping the soversion.