Le 14/03/2012 19:23, Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
Christian Costatitan.costa@gmail.com writes:
We forward the method to it's implementation in another interface which is a "partial stub" (in reality it is more a "partial implementation" as you will see in next patches). From the log we can see a method redirected from interface 2 to interface 3 and then that the method is implemented as "partial stub". Without the patches I see in the log a partial stub from a trace followed by a partial stub from a fixme. That's confusing. I don't see your point with someone novice in this area. Could you elaborate?
If there's already a stub message in the forwarded function and there's really nothing else to do in this function then you can get rid of the partial stub, but adding a trace that essentially describes the implementation is not useful. It's not like the function is suddenly going to do something else.
So I keep the TRACE but remove the "partial stub" part, right ? The forwarding information is just a way to make things more explicit but I can deduce it from a log so I can live without it.
Christian