Re: wine/dlls/comctl32 listview.c

[Paul Rupe]

On 26 Sep 2002, [e-mail] wrote:
> Of course it does. Damn, I was tracking this bug myself, but I
> thought my changes introduced them. :) I'll look into it. But
> why the change in the first place???

It was my fault, sorry.  I changed it because I had a crash where one of 
those steps failed, but it left the freed pointer in the array to be used 
later.  I was hoping simply reordering things would prevent that, but I 
guess I missed a dependency.  I submitted another patch that puts the order 
back the way it was and does the extra work in the cleanup instead.