Re: RFC: Highlighting Fall-throughs

[Andrew Talbot]

Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Alex Bradbury wrote:
> > Marking fall through cases sounds reasonable on the face of it to me.
> > I question the necessity of adding 'unaudited' comments though. I'd
> > imagine lint or one of the more sophisticated static analysis tools
> > could pretty easily give you a list of cases with fall-through without
> > a comment marking it as intentional.
> >
> > Alex

On further reflection, I think you are right. The single comment is enough 
on its own.

Thanks, Alex.