Re: [PATCH] ws2_32: Trace status on operation failure.

[Zebediah Figura]

On 2/9/22 11:10, Paul Gofman wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gofman
>   Supersedes 226140.
>
>   v2:
>        - use TRACE instead of WARN.
>
> dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

If we're going to just TRACE always, is there any point in guarding it 
to only print on failure?