Re: rpcrt4: Fix some conditional includes

[Alexandre Julliard]

Francois Gouget  writes:
> Either they are conditional and then having ifdefs in only 1/10 of the
> time is useless.
>
> Or they are not and then there's no point in having HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H &
> co.
>
> Any objection to patches that would switch to strict ifdef enforcement
> for these headers?

There's no point, since we haven't yet found a platform that doesn't
have them. The defines only exist because of things that autoconf does
behind the scenes, we don't explicitly check for these headers.