I'm glad for you guys you had great time there! :-)
I wanted to raise the Bugzilla topic, but waited for the license discussions to finish.
--- michael cardenas michael.cardenas@lindows.com
Dimitry brought up the issue that it is important to have small enough bugs that developers can work on them.
In this regard there should be 2 categories of bugs: a) metabugs b) tasklets
The metabugs are big and pretty much general. Good metabugs are: "Wine 0.9", "dll separation". Then we make a lot of small bugs - "tasklets" and make the metabugs depend on them.
dimitry suggested posting the top 10 or 20 bugs to wine-devel every other week, and I suggested putting the in WWN.
I'm not sure about usefullness of this one. What we need are people, responsible for Wine subsystems. Whe a bug is confirmed than it is assigned to developer (bug administrator ?), responsible for the subsystem.
A new mailing list will be created, called wine-bugs so that people can be notified of new bugs and hopefully respond to users in a timely manner.
We already have such list. It is called "wine-user" :-) Really, one of the goals of the wine-user list is to discuss issues with wine and the wine users are already signed to it! I don't want to have too many mailing lists to subscribe to.
Andriy Palamarchuk
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/