On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:13:46AM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote: [...]
So LPSTORAGE16 would be more fitting I think.
You mean in the documentation?
In the documentation I guess it is ok.
Hmm, now I see that IStorage16 and LPSTORAGE16 are defined in dlls/ole32/ifs.h and the structures they point to probably don't have the same layout as their 32bit equivalents. So it would probably make more sense to refer to those types in the documentation. Would the attached patch be ok?
The structs have the same source layout (same function order, same arguments), but different calling conventions (32 stdcall vs 16 bit). I have to define them differently in WINE at least.
Its ok.
(LPOLECLIENTSITE16 is not defined yet in ifs.h or elsewhere but I guess that will come)
When it is needed ... the program I have currently does not need further OLE handholding.
Ciao, Marcus