Re: LoadResource with module=0x00400000 followed by stack overflow

[Mike Hearn]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:49:25 +0200, Jan-Espen Pettersen wrote:
> Can a win32 program expect that it has write access to the memory
> pointed to by the return value of LoadResource with module 0x00400000?
> Should LoadResource in some cases copy the memory and return a writeable
> copy of the resource?

The SEH handling code should catch this case and un-protect the resource
section. At least it does for InstallShield ... I'm not sure why it's not
working here.

thanks -mike