Re: PATCH: kernel / errno testing

[Francois Gouget]

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > glibc 2.3.current CVS is throwing a huge stone in our direction,
> > it no longer allows overload of __errno_location.
> >
> > To visualize this problem I have added this testcase.
>
> ...
> > sched_yield(); /* will not change errno */
>
> BTW sched_yield() is allowed to be a no-op; would nanosleep()
> or something like that be a better choice?

Even better, can we achieve the same effect with a Win32 function? Maybe
Sleep(10) (milliseconds) or something like it? It seems like it should
be possible to write this without any platform dependent code.