Re: Winecfg -> browse for folder

[Mike Hearn]

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:02:05 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
> Ofcourse, but the api call SHBrowseForFolder returns a pidl. So making 
> unix browsing an extra flag wouldn't be useful, if I couldn't return a 
> valid pidl in the unix case.
>
> Hmm, I guess perhaps it is best to make an extra api function for unix 
> browsing anyway.

Ah OK, I didn't realise that. You could always just cast the result, a
PIDL is a pointer at the end of the day, but I agree that's rather ugly. A
new Wine API seems like the best route.