On 3/8/21 6:22 AM, Haoyang Chen wrote:
The original sequence may be stored in lparam. During the sorting process, this sequence is out-of-order, but lparam remains unchanged.
Could you explain some more, how does it break?
Signed-off-by: Haoyang Chen chenhaoyang@uniontech.com
dlls/comctl32/dpa.c | 13 ++++++-- dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/dpa.c b/dlls/comctl32/dpa.c index 36b3a422e8c..69e9d0a33bb 100644 --- a/dlls/comctl32/dpa.c +++ b/dlls/comctl32/dpa.c @@ -818,8 +818,17 @@ BOOL WINAPI DPA_Sort (HDPA hdpa, PFNDPACOMPARE pfnCompare, LPARAM lParam) TRACE("(%p %p 0x%lx)\n", hdpa, pfnCompare, lParam);
if ((hdpa->nItemCount > 1) && (hdpa->ptrs))
DPA_QuickSort (hdpa->ptrs, 0, hdpa->nItemCount - 1,
pfnCompare, lParam);
{
LPVOID *ptrs = HeapAlloc (hdpa->hHeap, HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY,
hdpa->nItemCount * sizeof(LPVOID));
if (!ptrs)
return FALSE;
memcpy(ptrs, hdpa->ptrs, hdpa->nItemCount * sizeof(LPVOID));
DPA_QuickSort (ptrs, 0, hdpa->nItemCount - 1, pfnCompare, lParam);
memcpy(hdpa->ptrs, ptrs, hdpa->nItemCount * sizeof(LPVOID));
HeapFree (hdpa->hHeap, 0, ptrs);
}
return TRUE;
}
If it's DPA issue, you should test DPA API directly, the fact that we use it internally for Listview is implementation details.
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c b/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c index e95b81f5bb1..7b036a9f6c1 100644 --- a/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c +++ b/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c @@ -2921,6 +2921,28 @@ static INT WINAPI test_CallBackCompare(LPARAM first, LPARAM second, LPARAM lPara return (first > second ? 1 : -1); }
+static INT WINAPI test_CallBackCompare1(LPARAM first, LPARAM second, LPARAM lParam) +{
- CHAR str1[5];
- CHAR str2[5];
- INT r;
- HWND hwnd = (HWND)lParam;
- LV_ITEMA item = {0};
- if (first == second) return 0;
- item.cchTextMax = 5;
- item.iSubItem = 0;
- item.pszText = str1;
- r = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_GETITEMTEXTA, first, (LPARAM)&item);
- expect(TRUE, r);
- item.pszText = str2;
- r = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_GETITEMTEXTA, second, (LPARAM)&item);
- expect(TRUE, r);
- return atoi(str1) > atoi(str2) ? 1 : -1;
+}
static void test_sorting(void) { HWND hwnd; @@ -2929,6 +2951,9 @@ static void test_sorting(void) LONG_PTR style; static CHAR names[][5] = {"A", "B", "C", "D", "0"}; CHAR buff[10];
static CHAR before_sort_array[][5] = {"6","3","1","4","2"};
static CHAR after_sort_arary[][5] = {"1","2","3","4","6"};
INT i;
hwnd = create_listview_control(LVS_REPORT); ok(hwnd != NULL, "failed to create a listview window\n");
@@ -2979,6 +3004,40 @@ static void test_sorting(void)
DestroyWindow(hwnd);
- hwnd = create_listview_control(LVS_REPORT);
- ok(hwnd != NULL, "failed to create a listview window\n");
- item.mask = LVIF_PARAM | LVIF_TEXT;
- item.iSubItem = 0;
- item.cchTextMax = 5;
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(before_sort_array)/5; i++)
- {
item.iItem = i;
item.lParam = i;
item.pszText = &before_sort_array[i][0];
r = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_INSERTITEMA, 0, (LPARAM)&item);
expect(i, r);
- }
- r = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_SORTITEMS, (WPARAM)(LPARAM)hwnd, (LPARAM)test_CallBackCompare1);
- expect(TRUE, r);
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(after_sort_arary)/5; i++)
- {
CHAR str[5];
item.iItem = i;
item.cchTextMax = 5;
item.iSubItem = 0;
item.pszText = str;
r = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_GETITEMTEXTA, i, (LPARAM)&item);
expect(TRUE, r);
expect(0, strcmp(str,&after_sort_arary[i][0]));
- }
- DestroyWindow(hwnd);
- /* switch to LVS_SORTASCENDING when some items added */ hwnd = create_listview_control(LVS_REPORT); ok(hwnd != NULL, "failed to create a listview window\n");
Looks like this produces test failures.