These failing test are dependent on the load of the VM at the time. Should we just adjust the timeout to something like 5/10 seconds?
The V2 failed initially but with the increased timeout it passed when manually run. https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=57310
Regards Alistair.
________________________________ From: Marvin testbot@winehq.org Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2019 10:52 AM To: leslie_alistair@hotmail.com leslie_alistair@hotmail.com Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmime/tests: Add a notification_type test
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftestbot.wi...
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
dmime: performance.c:432: Test failed: Failed: 258 performance.c:469: Test failed: Wrong end segment performance.c:470: Test failed: Didn't recieve DMUS_NOTIFICATION_SEGEND message