Re: msvcrt: compatibility fixes

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dimitrie O. Paun"  writes:
> Hmmm, thinking about it, even more so, shouldn't we also be
> compatible with that? I mean, if it was defined by them, we
> shouldn't define it again, no?

It shouldn't hurt to redefine it, unless the definitions are not
compatible, in which case we are in big trouble anyway.
> This is getting tiredsome -- why not have a wine/msvcrt.h header
> to put all this stuff into? We aren't breaking any compatibility,
> since we don't include any other header, we're just defining what
> we define inline anyway.

No, I think it's much cleaner to keep the standard headers independent
from Wine.