On Tuesday 06 September 2005 10:27, you wrote:
Kuba Ober wrote:
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 07:38, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Peter Beutner p.beutner@gmx.net writes:
Any reasons given?
Stability is the obvious reason.
Stability? It'd still be at most as unstable as a native windows session, so I don't see a big deal with that. If wineserver and/or user process crashes, so what? That'd very likely happen on the native platform as well, so I fail to see anything wrong with that approach from the stability perspective...
Except that Windows doesn't have missing functions or functions that aren't quite completely implemented.
I was looking at it entirely from the overall stability standpoint, assuming that wine will otherwise move forward. If we assume that wine will forever be stuck where it's now then of course this wouldn't make big sense. But then it's a strategic decision that will affect the long run, mostly, as right now there'd be like one or two drivers supported anyway (copy protection I'd assume)...
Kuba