10 Dec
2012
10 Dec
'12
4:52 a.m.
2012/12/6 Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
If you can't think of anything to test beyond the handful of cases you already have, then you shouldn't be implementing that function. There's no hope that your code will be able to cope with invalid input if you can't even imagine what invalid input could look like.
My submission already tests invalid input. I see now that I could test the ASCII range more thoroughly, and I didn't include tests for base64 sequences terminated without a - sign (which are perfectly valid), but how can I know whether you're looking for this or something else? Who could I ask for help?
-Alex