Re: bt in traces

[Boaz Harrosh]

why can't you Just use a debugger?

Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to output the backtrace while the program is running? I
> mean that with a new debug command e.g. wine_dbg_bt or so you
> could output not only the name of the called function and the argument
> values (as with the debug channels) but also the call stack where it
> came from. That's of course only temporarily for debugging inside
> wine. If I see that a function has a problem because the argument is
> wrong it would be much easier to find out where this came from.
> If I only want to use it inside wine it should have access to the
> call stack information, no?
>
> Thanks
>
> bye  Fabi