6 Dec
2012
6 Dec
'12
5:57 a.m.
2012/12/5 Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
You have nowhere near enough tests to make such a claim. When I said to write more tests, I didn't mean one or two more. You'd probably need at least 100 tests to have decent coverage of all the interesting cases.
It's not as much of a technical problem as it is a communication problem--I don't know what "interesting cases" you have in mind that are not already covered by the tests. Perhaps these cases would be obvious to a more experienced developer, but they are not to me.
-Alex