2008/10/30 James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Pete Myers peterdanielmyers@googlemail.com wrote:
It does match the style of the way that HeapAlloc is used elsewhere in the file, though not malloc admittedly. I wasn't sure which convention had precedent.
Please bottom-post when replying to a post on the wine lists. There is one test function that uses a space after opening parentheses, but it's the exception, not the rule.
Sure, I'll be more careful about both of those in future.
I'm afraid that I don't understand how my changelog doesn't match the patch. I'm new here, can you help me out? There's obviously something I'm missing!
You had several 'changelog' entries in the email, but the last one was
Changelog:
- malloc calls in dlls/kernel32/process.c have been change to HeapAlloc
which does not match the patch.
That was a dumb mistake, caused by copying and pasting from a different patch. Thanks for your help James, I'll try and fix the patch then resubmit.
Pete Myers