On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 21:29, Vincent Béron wrote:
Le mer 19/11/2003 à 15:24, Sylvain Petreolle a écrit :
--- Vincent Béron vberon@mecano.gme.usherb.ca a écrit :
What's the output of rpm -q prelink? What's the output of ldd /usr/bin/wine (or anything dynamically linked to libc)?
[syl@wine wine]$ rpm -q prelink package prelink is not installed [syl@wine wine]$ ldd /usr/local/bin/wine libwine.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libwine.so.1 (0x00111000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x00c45000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x004e9000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0090d000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00def000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00ef9000)
If prelink is not installed, what you see here is very much probably the result of exec-shield. Does repeating ldd on the same file yields the same results, or do they differ each time?
I have the same configuration as Sylvain (RH9 -> Fedora Core 1) and I have the same behavior. When I do a ldd wine I have always the same result.
Did you installed through an upgrade, or from scratch?
It was an upgrade from RH 9 Shrike (athlon) to Fedora beta3 and upgrade via up2date.
I upgraded from RH9 to FC1 with the iso cds.
So you somehow ended up without prelink (which I thought was part of the base install). Maybe that's a Fedora bug, but maybe not.
I do not have prelink installed too.
Vincent