James Hawkins wrote:
2008/10/8 Chris Ahrendt celticht32@aol.com:
per dan resending
chris
From e8ec03471e1206ea93fa6224d7c6b8b61422d80e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Ahrendt celticht32@aol.com Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:02:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Checked all the states of variables in test to ensure that they are not NULL
This broad-sweep approach is not correct. If there is a machine that is crashing on a NULL interface, then a check needs to be added where that machine returns a NULL interface and we should then skip those particular tests. There are plenty of examples of this you can look for.
It was not a broad sweep... I know where it crashed and am checking there. However, I noticed there were several other places were at sometimes it checked for null and other places it did not.. so I went through and made sure all of the ones without the check now have the check.
Chris