Re: propsys: mention that the functions are stubs

[Francois Gouget]

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Hans Leidekker wrote:
[...]
> Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
> fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
> percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
> > I would further argue that even a human reading the log would have no
> > way to know as quite a few implemented functions still dump their parameters.
> > So even for humans it's better to add 'stub' to the FIXME message.
>
> I'd say we need turn those into traces and add fixmes for the
> unimplemented parts, if needed.

I agree with the turning these to TRACE()s part. In all the other places 
I have seen they are TRACE()s, not FIXME()s. But they need the 'stub' 
keyword either way to not be ambiguous.