Re: Wayland driver development - December 2021 update and next steps

[Alexandre Julliard]

Alexandros Frantzis  writes:
> Excluding the currently ongoing driver transition, i.e., let's assume it
> was finished and the Wayland driver was up-to-date for it, what are your
> thoughts about the proposed upstreaming plan for the Wayland driver?
> Would you be willing to accept the driver upstream (assuming good
> quality code etc) according to that plan?

I haven't looked at the code yet, but sure, if it's clean code, seems to
work for people, and doesn't break too many tests, there's no reason
that it couldn't go upstream.