Re: [4/7] comctl32/updown: Show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect behaviour for already created control

[Paul Vriens]

On 09/25/2009 10:27 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
> > On 09/20/2009 10:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> > > > From 8981901ce08501229487a1fcd2d430490cb66823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > >
> > > From: Nikolay Sivov
> > > Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:52:39 +0400
> > > Subject: Tests to show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect
> > > behaviour for already created control
> > >
> > > dlls/comctl32/tests/updown.c | 59
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Hi Nikolay,
> >
> > This one (and also "[5/7] comctl32/updown: Fix control behaviour for
> > UDS_SETBUDDYINT style") add some tests that use UDM_GETPOS32 and/or
> > UDM_SETPOS32.
> >
> > These are only available as of 5.80.
> >
> > We are already skipping tests in updown because of this, but not these
> > new ones yet. Any idea about the cleanest approach?
>
> Hi.
>
> These could be replaced with UDM_GETPOS/UDM_SETPOS without any problems.
> Could you make a patch? I'm too busy now, sorry.

Sure, but that will be after the weekend for me as well.